I quite like this; it's mostly well-written, where it's not overwritten with showboaty rhetorical jargon. I suppose that's an 'About Barthes' thing, I've seen it before, lots. Academia, eh? I feel I already have a pretty good handle on pop-culture Barthes, having never actually read him (I tend to skate over texts, avoiding the thin ice). Always fun to get a new, thoughtful and erudite take!
The ostensible subject of this one, "Keeper of the Hearth" is unclear until almost half-way through, where it is named. Ok...
“Here already from the very beginning England’s heart shines,” admires EZM. “She wishes to create a network and community of colleagues banded together to interpret ideals of love, responsibility, comfort, and most importantly care taking.” England? WTF? Oh, the editor.
Thanks very much for your comment. If you read Barthes, you may find that his texts differ significantly from how they have been appropriated by his acolytes in academia.
I enjoyed your review, which convinces me that it is not an essential book to look for, as if it would be available for perusal anywhere near me.
As I looked further down your comments here I flashed on the title as Camera Luddite thinking it of a piece with your review and appropriate, which isn't to say that I have not found Barthes' small book without merit (its the "acolytes in academia" I have mostly not read), illuminating and identifying issues beyond the circularity of most photospeak., pertinent to contemporaneity.
The gatekeepers. The emergents. The holy lucky ones. The smoothies. The ones who lend the moon a beam. The ones who defer to degrees of lockstep. The bald cynicism which informs my viewfinder. Thank you, Mr. McClintock. Your essay underlines the lubrication of a pervasive machination, which thrives on rehashing contemporary photographers the world needs to watch.
I quite like this; it's mostly well-written, where it's not overwritten with showboaty rhetorical jargon. I suppose that's an 'About Barthes' thing, I've seen it before, lots. Academia, eh? I feel I already have a pretty good handle on pop-culture Barthes, having never actually read him (I tend to skate over texts, avoiding the thin ice). Always fun to get a new, thoughtful and erudite take!
The ostensible subject of this one, "Keeper of the Hearth" is unclear until almost half-way through, where it is named. Ok...
“Here already from the very beginning England’s heart shines,” admires EZM. “She wishes to create a network and community of colleagues banded together to interpret ideals of love, responsibility, comfort, and most importantly care taking.” England? WTF? Oh, the editor.
Thanks very much for your comment. If you read Barthes, you may find that his texts differ significantly from how they have been appropriated by his acolytes in academia.
I have no doubt. That's why I like your take, I've never encountered it before. I might even read Barthes, one day!
If you decide to take the plunge, I recommend starting with Mythologies and, if you like it, then move on to Camera Lucida. Enjoy, and thanks again!
I enjoyed your review, which convinces me that it is not an essential book to look for, as if it would be available for perusal anywhere near me.
As I looked further down your comments here I flashed on the title as Camera Luddite thinking it of a piece with your review and appropriate, which isn't to say that I have not found Barthes' small book without merit (its the "acolytes in academia" I have mostly not read), illuminating and identifying issues beyond the circularity of most photospeak., pertinent to contemporaneity.
Thanks for your comment. I wish the academically inclined would read Barthes for Barthes, rather than for photography.
The gatekeepers. The emergents. The holy lucky ones. The smoothies. The ones who lend the moon a beam. The ones who defer to degrees of lockstep. The bald cynicism which informs my viewfinder. Thank you, Mr. McClintock. Your essay underlines the lubrication of a pervasive machination, which thrives on rehashing contemporary photographers the world needs to watch.
Thank for your poetic reading of my text. I really appreciate your remarks.